关与本转专的问体(页 1) - 澳洲留学移民 -

关与本转专的问体

[font=宋体]
[font=宋体][size=5]本人现在在有5周的语言,读完后可直升RMIT读ECONOMICS AND FINANCE,并且已交了半年的学费,但为了能[/size][/font]
[font=宋体][size=5]快点移民,我想转TAFE读COOKERY,但这就牵连到我的签证问题,我的是473,要换成472的,但这其中的应注意事项小弟我完全不懂,有哪位大大有好的见意能否指点小弟一下,拜谢![/size][/font]
[size=5][/size][/font]

不是你想转就能转的，RMIT不给你RELEASE LETTER的话你哪都去不了。
尝试一下拿TAFE和RMIT的PACKAGE OFFER吧，但最好找有经验的中介代理，自己去弄的话很浪费时间。但中介费怎么样就难说了。

能否拿到RELEASE LETTER和PACKAGE OFFER是关键，DIAC对由上往下转的课程VISA卡得很严，所以PACKAGE OFFER很重要，而且那就不需要转签证。

PS：subclass是573不是473。

根据最新2007年7月1日公布的NATIONAL CODE 2007,你需要完成至少6个月的主课（RMIT),才能从573类转到572类的课程学习，具体请看以下说明：

转到厨师课程，并不见得一帆风顺，也是一个很艰难的选择！慎重！

Standard 7 – Transfer Between Registered Providers [table=98%,white][tr][td][b]Registered providers assess requests from students for a transfer between registered providers prior to the student completing six months of his or her principal course of study in accordance with their documented procedures.[/b]
[/td][/tr][/table]
This standard provides mobility for students up to the end of six months of their principal course of study in restricted circumstances. Providers have increased autonomy in determining whether students are able to transfer to another provider prior to the student completing six months of their principal course of study.
After the first six months of the principal course no restrictions will apply[b].[/b]
[b]Key requirements for all sectors[/b]
[list][*]Registered providers are restricted from enrolling transferring students before the student has completed six months of the student’s principal course of study except for circumstances outlined in this standard.[*]The restriction applies from the time a student commences study until he or she has completed six months of his or her principal course. This includes restricting a student’s transfer from a course prior to the student’s principal course in a package of courses.[*]Where a student requests a transfer within this restricted period, the provider must assess requests against its documented student transfer request assessment policy and procedures.[*]Requests can be refused, but the reasons must be given to the student in writing.[*]A student can appeal against a refusal to release or, if the provider does not respond during the timeframe set out in the policy, through the provider’s complaints and appeal process.[*]The new provider must issue a valid enrolment offer.[*]Where the original provider decides to grant a letter of release, it must issue the letter of release at no cost to the student.[*]Under-18 students must have written confirmation from their legal guardian or parent to transfer. Where the student is not being cared for in Australia by a parent or suitable nominated relative, the receiving registered provider must accept responsibility for approving the student’s accommodation, support and general welfare arrangements as per [url=http://aei.dest.gov.au/AEI/ESOS/NationalCodeExplanatoryGuide/PartD/Standard_5.htm][color=#0000ff]Standard 5[/color][/url].[*]Providers must keep records of requests for letters of release and the process used to make a decision in relation to the request.[/list][b]What’s new?[/b]
[list][*]Under the National Code 2007, the registered provider is restricted from enrolling a transferring student before the student has completed six months of his or her principal course. Before 1 July 2007, students’ movements were restricted by a visa condition for 12 months.[*]Students can apply to transfer before they have completed six months of their principal course, and the transfer may be approved in limited circumstances.
[*]The provider must have documented policies and procedures for assessing applications for transfer.[*]Under the National Code 2007, providers must accept responsibility for assessing applications for transfer. Before 1 July 2007, the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) assessed all applications from students for a transfer within the first 12 months of the principal course of study.[*]If a student’s request for release is refused, the student must be informed in writing of his or her right to appeal the decision.[/list]

[table=98%,#ffbf61][tr][td=3,1][b]What this standard involves:
[size=1]
[/size][/b]
[/td][/tr][tr][td]7.1   [/td][td=2,1]The receiving registered provider must not knowingly enrol the student wishing to transfer from another registered provider’s course prior to the student completing six months of his or her principal course of study except where:
[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]a.   [/td][td]the original registered provider has ceased to be registered or the course in which the student is enrolled has ceased to be registered;
[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]b.[/td][td]the original registered provider has provided a written letter of release;[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]c.[/td][td]the original registered provider has had a sanction imposed on its registration by the Australian Government or state or territory government that prevents the student from continuing his or her principal course; or[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]d.[/td][td]any government sponsor of the student considers the change to be in the student’s best interest and has provided written support for that change.[/td][/tr][/table][list][*]Providers must not actively recruit a student before the student has completed six months of his or her principal course except in certain circumstances outlined in 7.1 above. These restrictions also apply to the courses before the principal course in a package of courses. A student must remain with his or her provider for all of his or her courses before the principal course in a package of courses unless 7.1 applies.[*]If any of the conditions in 7.1 apply, a receiving registered provider may enrol a student before he or she has completed six months of the principal course.[*]From 1 July 2007, when providers go into the Provider Registration and International Student Management System (PRISMS) to create a new [url=http://aei.dest.gov.au/AEI/ESOS/NationalCodeOfPractice2007/Definitions.htm#coe][color=#0000ff]CoE[/color][/url], PRISMS will advise them if the student has [b]not[/b] completed six months of the principal course. PRISMS will not tell the provider who the student is currently studying with, but will alert providers trying to issue a new CoE that the student is enrolled elsewhere.[*]From 1 July 2007, if the receiving registered provider wishes to issue a CoE for a student who has not completed the first six months of his or her principal course, PRISMS will ask the provider one or more questions:[list][*][i]Does the student require a letter of release?[/i] [Answer: Yes or No]
The answer will be ‘Yes’ unless the circumstances listed in Standard 7.1 have occurred.[/list][/list][list][list][list][*]If the answer is ‘No’, the response is recorded and the provider will be allowed to continue with creating the CoE.[*]If the answer is ‘Yes’ the provider will be asked the following question:[/list][/list][/list]
[list][list][*][i]Have you sighted the letter of release from the previous provider?[/i] [Answer: Yes or No][list][*]If the provider answers ‘Yes’, the response will be recorded and the provider will be allowed to continue with creating the CoE.[*]If the answer is ‘No’, the provider will be shown the following warning:[/list][*][i]It would appear that you may be in breach of the requirements in Standard 7 should you continue to create the CoE for this student. This information will be recorded. Do you wish to create the CoE? [/i][Answer: Yes or No][list][*]If the provider answers ‘Yes’, the provider will be required to enter reasons for doing so (in the mandatory comments field).[*]If the provider answers ‘No’, the CoE approval process will be cancelled.[/list][/list][*]If a student transfers to another provider, any refunds of course fees paid to the original provider will be in accordance with the original provider’s refund policy.[*]Marketing and recruitment staff and agents must be aware of the limitations on transfer before completion of six months of a principal course. They must advise overseas students (or parent or guardian if the overseas student is under 18) of these limitations.[/list][table=98%,#ffbf61][tr][td]7.2 [/td][td=2,1]The registered provider must have and implement its documented student transfer request assessment policy and procedure, which is available to staff and students. The policy must specify:[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]a.   [/td][td]the circumstances in which a transfer will be granted;[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]b.[/td][td]the circumstances the registered provider considers as providing reasonable grounds for refusing the student’s request, including when a transfer can be considered detrimental to the student; and[/td][/tr][tr][td]  [/td][td]c.[/td][td]a reasonable timeframe for assessing and replying to the student’s transfer request having regard to the restricted period.[/td][/tr][/table]
[list][*]A provider’s transfer request policy will be used to assess students’ applications for a letter of release. The transfer request policy must include:[list][*]the circumstances in which a transfer will be granted.[*]a statement to the effect that a transfer will be refused unless:[list][*]a student has a valid enrolment offer from the receiving provider; and[*]if the student is an under-18 student, there is written evidence that the student’s parent or legal guardian supports the transfer AND written confirmation that the new provider will accept responsibility for approving a student’s accommodation, support and general welfare arrangements as per Standard 5.[/list][*]any circumstances in which a transfer will be refused, including when the transfer may be considered detrimental to the student; and[*]a timeframe for assessing and replying to the student’s transfer request. This timeframe must be reasonable.[/list][*]A provider is entitled to determine the circumstances in which it may provide or refuse to provide a letter of release.

For example, a provider may choose to have a policy that a letter of release will not be granted to a student:[list][*]if the transfer may jeopardise the student’s progression through a package of courses;[*]within X weeks of a course beginning. (Issues such as homesickness may take some time to overcome and transferring to another provider is unlikely to solve this problem. The provider may consider that the student needs some time to settle in to the course and the Australian education system and for the student to use and benefit from the provider’s student support services.); or[*]if the provider forms the view that the student is trying to avoid being reported to DIAC for failure to meet the provider’s attendance or academic progress requirements.[/list][/list]Alternatively, a provider may choose to have a policy that a letter of release will automatically be granted to any student who requests one.

[table=98%,#ffbf61][tr][td]7.3   [/td][td=3,1]The registered provider must grant a letter of release only where the student has:[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]a.   [/td][td=2,1]provided a letter from another registered provider confirming that a valid enrolment offer has been made; and
[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td]b.[/td][td=2,1]where the student is under 18;
[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td][/td][td]i.    [/td][td]the registered provider has written confirmation that the student’s parent or legal guardian supports the transfer; and
[/td][/tr][tr][td][/td][td][/td][td]ii.[/td][td]where the student is not being cared for in Australia by a parent or suitable nominated relative, the valid enrolment offer also confirms that the registered provider will accept that responsibility for approving the student’s accommodation, support and general welfare arrangements as per Standard 5 (Younger students).
[/td][/tr][/table][list][*]Providers must assess a student’s request for release against their policies and procedures.[*]The provider must not issue a letter of release for a student who does not have a valid letter of offer of enrolment with another provider. Similarly, if the student is under 18, the provider must not issue a letter of release unless the student has written evidence that his or her parent or legal guardian supports the transfer AND written confirmation that the new provider will accept responsibility for approving the student’s accommodation, support and general welfare arrangements as per Standard 5.[*]Note: For under-18 students, support for the transfer must be obtained from the student’s parent or legal guardian. The person with whom the student is living in Australia (for example, homestay provider) will often not be the student’s parent or legal guardian.[*]To facilitate a transfer between providers, the receiving provider must issue a letter offering the student enrolment. However, it must not formally [b]enrol[/b] (issue a CoE) the student until either 7.1 a., c. or d. occurs or it has seen a letter of release from the student’s current provider. The receiving provider is advised to make and keep a copy of the letter of release as evidence of existence for compliance purposes.[/list][table=98%,#ffbf61][tr][td]7.4   [/td][td]A letter of release, if granted, must be issued at no cost to the student and must advise the student of the need to contact DIAC to seek advice on whether a new student visa is required.[/td][/tr][/table]
[list][*]A new visa may be required if the new course is in a different sector to the original course or if there is an extension required to the student’s visa. To find out more about visa requirements, go to [url=http://www.immi.gov.au/][color=#0000ff]http://www.immi.gov.au[/color][/url][/list][table=98%,#ffbf61][tr][td]7.5   [/td][td]Where the registered provider does not grant a letter of release, the student must be provided with written reasons for refusing the request and must be informed of his or her right to appeal the registered provider’s decision in accordance with Standard 8 (Complaints and appeals).
[/td][/tr][/table]
[list][*]A student should be informed of the outcome of his or her application for transfer within a reasonable timeframe. Good practice would require a period (for example, 10 working days) within which the student would have received notification of the result of the application for transfer.[*]If a request for release is refused, the criteria used and the reasons for refusal are given to the student in writing, together with advice that it is possible to lodge an appeal if the student thinks there are sufficient grounds.[*]The documented appeals mechanisms that were referred to in the students’ orientation will apply where the overseas student wishes to lodge an appeal.[/list][table=98%,#ffbf61][tr][td]7.6    [/td][td]The registered provider must maintain records of all requests from students for a letter of release and the assessment of, and decision regarding, the request on the student’s file.
[/td][/tr][/table]
[table=90%,white][tr][td][b]Compliance tips[/b]
For a provider to show it is complying with Standard 7, it may need some of the following as evidence:
[list][*]requests from students for a letter of release, for example, the provider’s request for release form completed and signed by the students;[*]the assessment of the request, for example, the provider’s decision written on the request form;[*]a copy of the letter informing the student of the decision and reasons if the student’s request is refused;[*]if there is an appeal, evidence that the appeal was conducted in accordance with the provider’s appeal processes outlined in Standard 8;[*]if the student is under 18, written confirmation that the student’s parent or legal guardian supports the transfer;[*]if the student is under 18 and is not being cared for in Australia by a parent or suitable nominated relative, a valid enrolment offer confirming that the receiving provider will accept responsibility for approving the student’s accommodation, support and general welfare arrangements as per Standard 5; and[*]a copy of letters of release for any student it has enrolled before the student had completed six months of the principal course of study.[/list][/td][/tr][/table]

Common questions and answers

Please note: The principles in the examples below can be applied to all sectors.

Q1    Can a student transfer from a prerequisite course or enabling course before beginning the principal course?

A Unless released, a student is restricted from transferring between providers during prerequisite or enabling courses that form a package with the principal course. Transfers may occur under the circumstances listed under Standard 7.1.


Student following a package of courses requests transfer

At the University of the East, Thanh is enrolled in a package of courses comprising English language of six months duration followed by a Bachelor of Arts course of three years duration. Four weeks after starting the English language course, Thanh requests to transfer to an English language course at the Intercontinental Institute of Advanced English.

As Thanh has not yet completed six months of his principal course, the Intercontinental Institute of Advanced English cannot enrol him without a letter of release. The university assesses the request for transfer in accordance with its policy and decides to provide Thanh with a letter of release on the basis that its policy includes transfer to an equivalent preparatory course as a circumstance in which transfer will be granted.

The university reports Thanh’s termination of studies via PRISMS and he is issued with a new CoE for the new course by the Intercontinental Institute of Advanced English. Thanh’s application for a refund is subject to the university’s refund policy which was part of the provider’s written agreement with the student.



Note:

This English language course is a prerequisite course being completed as part of a package so the restriction on transferring between providers applies while Thanh is enrolled in this course. The University of the East assessed the request in accordance with its transfer policy. The International Institute of Advanced English will create the new CoE.


Standard 7.4 requires that the letter of release must include instructions for the student to contact DIAC to seek advice on whether a new student visa is required.


If Thanh decides not study the Bachelor of Arts programme as originally planned in his package he will need to approach the University of the East for a letter of release from enrolment in the Bachelor of Arts degree. If the University of the East grants this request it will need to advise Thanh to contact DIAC to discuss possible implications for his visa.   


Please note that with packaged courses, the visa subclass corresponds with the sector of principal course.

[table=98%,white][tr][td][b][size=3]Q[/size]2   [/b][/td][td]If a student has a letter of offer from a second provider, does the original provider have to automatically grant a letter of release?[/td][/tr][tr][td][b][size=3]A[/size][/b][/td][td]No. The request for transfer must be assessed against the provider’s transfer request policy, and may be denied in accordance with that policy.  [/td][/tr][/table][table=90%,#c8e5f5][tr][td][b][i]Student has letter of offer from second provider, but is not released by original provider[/i][/b]
[i]Ania has been studying a diploma course at the University of the West for two months. She has decided that she wants to transfer to the University of the Far West because she has been offered entry to a similar diploma course there.[/i]
[i]She applies for a transfer from her original provider; however, the provider’s policy and procedures state that a letter of release will only be granted in exceptional circumstances relating to the welfare of the student. This is not the reason Ania wants to move. Ania is notified of the provider’s decision within two weeks of her application being received.[/i]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[b]Note[/b]:
[list][*]A letter of offer from a second provider does not automatically mean that a letter of release will be granted.[*]A student‘s application for transfer will be assessed against the provider’s documented policies and procedures for assessing a request for transfer.[*]If a request is denied, the provider provides the student with written reasons for refusing the request and the student is informed of his or her right to appeal the registered provider’s decision.[/list]

[table=98%,white][tr][td][b][size=3]Q[/size]3   [/b][/td][td]If an under-18 student has his or her guardian’s permission to transfer prior to completing six months of the principal course, is the student’s request for transfer automatically granted?[/td][/tr][tr][td][size=3][b]A[/b][/size][/td][td]No. Even with the parent or guardian’s permission for the student to transfer, the provider may refuse to release the student if the student’s reason for transfer is not included as allowable grounds under the provider’s transfer request assessment policy.
[/td][/tr][/table][table=90%,#c8e5f5][tr][td][b][i]An under-18 student’s request for transfer is refused[/i][/b]
[i]Tichy is a 17–year-old student who has come to Australia to learn English. He has a CoE from the Australian English Centre for a course in English language. He attends irregularly and receives a warning notice from the provider that his attendance is at 82 percent. Tichy feels that he will soon be reported to DIAC and, three months into the course, requests to be transferred to another registered provider - Central English College.[/i]
[i]Tichy has a letter of offer of enrolment from Central English College and a letter from his guardian to the effect that the guardian supports Tichy’s transfer. Both letters are submitted as part of the application for release in accordance with the Australian English Centre’s policy and procedure. The Australian English Centre rejects Tichy’s application because its policy states that students who have been warned for non-attendance will not be granted approval to transfer. [/i]
[i]The Australian English Centre’s decision is communicated in writing to Tichy, together with the reasons for refusal. Tichy is informed that he has the right to appeal the provider’s decision in accordance with the provider’s complaints and appeals process.[/i]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[b]Note:[/b]
[list][*]Tichy is under 18 and so requires written support from his guardian to transfer between providers.[*]The provider has a documented student transfer request assessment policy and procedure that prevents a student from transferring within the first six months if the student has received a warning letter for non-attendance.[/list]

[table=98%,white][tr][td][b][size=3]Q[/size]4 [/b]  [/td][td]Can a government-sponsored student transfer before completing six months of his or her principal course?
[/td][/tr][tr][td][b][size=3]A[/size][/b][/td][td]Yes, this is one of the situations in which a student may transfer to another provider within the first six months of commencing his or her principal course. In this situation, a letter of release from the original provider is not required.
However, a student’s application for transfer would be assessed against the provider’s refund policy and the decision may impact on the level of refund, if any.
[/td][/tr][/table][table=90%,#c8e5f5][tr][td][b][i]Government sponsored student seeks transfer[/i][/b]
[i]At the College of Practical Arts, Myan has been sponsored by the Government of Colombia to enrol in a Diploma of Manual Arts which is registered for a duration of two years. The Colombian Ambassador in Australia has received reports that Myan is unhappy because there are no other Colombians studying at the College of Practical Arts. The Ambassador considers a change of provider to be in the best interests of the student and provides written support for that change[/i].
[/td][/tr][/table]
[b]Note[/b]:
[list][*]Myan is sponsored by a foreign government. Refer to 7.1 d.[*]To transfer before completing six months of the student’s principal course, Myan must apply to the College of Practical Arts for a letter of release. The College of Practical Arts has a documented student transfer request assessment policy and procedure and assesses Myan’s request for transfer against that policy and procedure.[*]If Myan is released and subsequently applies for a refund, the College’s refund policy will determine the refund, if any, to which Myan is entitled.[/list]

[table=98%,white][tr][td][b][size=3]Q[/size]5   [/b][/td][td]What are some examples of what would be reasonable grounds for granting or refusing a request for a letter of release?[/td][/tr][tr][td][b][size=3]A[/size][/b][/td][td]For examples of what would and would not be appropriate grounds for granting a letter of release, please see below.[/td][/tr][/table][table=90%,#c8e5f5][tr][td][b]A student’s application for transfer is approved on academic grounds[/b]
[i]Letat had commenced her principal course at the Southern Institute of Studies, a small provider that offers only three courses for international students. Letat found that the Certificate IV course was far too difficult and was causing frustration and unhappiness for her.[/i]
[i]Letat’s friend informed her that a Certificate III course was available with a neighbouring CRICOS provider and Letat obtained a letter of offer from the neighbouring provider. Letat completed an application to transfer from the Southern Institute of Studies. As the institute recognised that its courses were too difficult for Letat, her application for transfer was approved.[/i]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[b]Note:[/b]
[list][*]The Southern Institute of Studies has a policy and procedure for assessing applications for course transfer within the first six months of commencing the principal course of study. The policy allows students to transfer if they are experiencing personal difficulty or educational problems that cannot be addressed by the provider’s resources.[*]In the case of Letat, it was recognised by the provider that the support services could not bridge the gap that would enable Letat to make satisfactory course progress.[/list][table=90%,#c8e5f5][tr][td][b]A student’s application for transfer is approved on personal grounds[/b]
[i]Seventeen-year-old Jose was studying a Diploma in Visual Arts at the Central College of the Arts in Adelaide, and was living with his 23-year-old brother who was a resident of Australia. Two months into Jose’s course, his brother was given a promotion, and told that his new job was located in Brisbane. [/i]
[i]Jose sought to study in Brisbane because he did not have alternative living arrangements and wanted to remain with his brother. Jose investigated a provider in Brisbane at which he could continue to study for the same qualification. He received an offer of enrolment from the Brisbane provider and applied to Central College for a transfer.[/i]
[i]Realising the significance to Jose of transferring to Brisbane, Central College approved the application for transfer[/i].
[/td][/tr][/table]
[b]Note[/b]:
[list][*]The Central College of Arts has a policy and procedure for assessing applications for transfer between providers within the first six months of a student commencing his or her principal course. Its policy permits transfer if it is in the interests of the welfare of the student.[/list][table=90%,#c8e5f5][tr][td][b]A provider does NOT approve a student’s request for transfer to another provider[/b]
[i]Peter is a university graduate who has enrolled in the Master of Professional Accounting at Midwest University. After three weeks he applies for a release to transfer to a Diploma in Accounting with another provider in the vocational education and training (VET) sector.[/i]
[i]The University Transfer Policy specifies that where students apply to transfer to another sector (for example, to English Language Intensive Course for Overseas Students (ELICOS) or VET) or another level (for example, Master to Bachelor course) the student must discuss the request with a university course advisor. The policy states that the course advisor will make a recommendation based on an assessment of what is in the student’s best interests, whether there are compassionate and compelling circumstances, and whether the student is likely to succeed in his or her present course.[/i]
[i]In this case, the course advisor recommends that a release be not granted but that Peter’s academic progress be monitored closely through the first semester. The course advisor believes Peter is capable, with effort, of succeeding in the Masters course, and advises him to access a structured study support programme. The university does not grant a release at this time. [/i]
[i]The University informs Peter of the decision, together with the reasons, and informs him also of his right to appeal in accordance with the university’s processes.[/i]
[/td][/tr][/table]
[b]Note:[/b]
[list][*]Refusal of the release was consistent with the institution’s student transfer request assessment policy and procedure (as required by 7.2) and the other requirements of the Standards, especially 7.5.[*]The institution provides monitoring and a study support programme to enhance his prospect of success.[/list][table=90%,#c8e5f5][tr][td][b]A provider considers that transfer to another provider would not be in the best interest of a student[/b]
[i]Imelda is studying English for Academic Purposes (EAP) at the International Language Academy as her principal course, but intends to proceed to a VET or higher education course at the end of her English course. EAP provides specific preparation for further study in English. The EAP course at the academy is recognised by several higher education and VET institutions as satisfying their English language entry requirements.[/i]
[i]Imelda then becomes aware of another ELICOS College specialising in General English where the tuition fees are considerably lower and the assessment tasks are believed to be less onerous. She obtains an offer of enrolment and applies for a release from the academy.[/i]
[i]The academy’s transfer request policy states that a release will be granted only where the transfer will not be to the detriment of the student or their future studies. In this case the Director of Studies refuses the release on the grounds that the intended course will not provide adequate preparation for further study, nor be recognised by higher education or VET providers as satisfying their entry requirements. A transfer would be detrimental to Imelda’s future study plans.[/i]
[i]The academy informs the student of the decision, together with the reasons, and informs her also of her right to appeal in accordance with the academy’s processes[/i].
[/td][/tr][/table]
[b]Note[/b]:
[list][*]Refusal of the release was consistent with the institution’s student transfer request assessment policy and procedure (as required by 7.2) and the other requirements of the standards, especially 7.5.[*]The academy made the assessment, consistent with its release policy that it was not in Imelda's best interest to grant a release.[/list]

Q6    What are the provider’s obligations to the student if his or her request for transfer is refused?

A Under 7.5, the student must be provided with written reasons for refusing the request and informed of his or her right to appeal the provider’s decision in accordance with the provider’s complaints and appeals process.



Q7 Is there a diagram which shows the steps involved in a transfer between registered providers?
A Yes. Transfer Between Registered Providers (pdf 19kb)

澳大利亚境内转换学校示意图

[size=5]谢谢楼上两位的指点,小弟感激不尽.因为这几天没能上网,所以不能马上感谢两位,为此深感报欠.[/size]
[size=5]想再问下如果要拿RELEASE LETTER的话是要亲自去向RMIT申请还是只要交给中介办就可以了?[/size]
[size=5]真是麻烦大家了.谢谢.[/size]

新版主太负责尽力了那么详细, 顶你

你自己申请也行，中介也行。